How decisions are made.
From a raised problem to the archive — through research, debate, drafting, and voting. Each stage has its own rules and timelines.
Any decision can be challenged. This is not a formality — it is a real mechanism.
The member receives a notification describing the violation.
48 hours to submit an appeal with an explanation.
A different moderator (not the one who made the first decision) reviews the appeal.
The decision is published with a justification. The outcome is final.
Moderation is not censorship. It protects the quality of the environment.
No silent deletions. Every moderation action comes with a justification.
Sharp disagreement is not a violation. Violations are threats, disinformation, and spam.
Warning → temporary restriction → ban. With the option to appeal at every step.
All moderation decisions are visible in the audit trail. Anonymization only if personal data is involved.
Working groups, initiative associations, and the Issue Committee are formed by clear rules, with reputation thresholds and transparent criteria.
How initiative groups form →The platform is being built. Leave your email to get a personal invite on launch day.